{"id":417,"date":"2012-03-28T04:02:33","date_gmt":"2012-03-28T04:02:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/psychepolitics.com\/?p=417"},"modified":"2012-04-02T01:39:17","modified_gmt":"2012-04-02T01:39:17","slug":"the-judges-psyche","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/psychepolitics.com\/?p=417","title":{"rendered":"The Judge&#8217;s Psyche"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Ever wonder what goes through the mind of a judge? Well, there are many things and many judges. Nonetheless, there are some common themes, as one who has done a fair amount of testifying and watching judges might tell you.<\/p>\n<p>First, we assume judges are comfortable making decisions. After all, that&#8217;s their job. However, through the eyes of this psychiatrist, not so. Every decision they make has the potential of creating an enemy. Ever wonder why they take cases under advisment. I am sure sometimes they actually seek the advice of other judges. More than likely, however, it is to avoid a direct, eye to eye confrontation with the party they find against. They just pocket the case and let the lawyers know their decision via their clerks or paperwork.<\/p>\n<p>Second, enemy avoidance aside, they don&#8217;t want to aggrieve a party. There is some guilty anxiety involved in hurting one of the parties.<\/p>\n<p>So, one the one hand, they experience uncomfortableness (anxiety) at being hurt, and on the other hand of hurting. What a position!<\/p>\n<p>So, while in the former case, they sometimes hide behind advisement, in the latter they often try to assuage the hurt, and therefore their anxiety, by saying a few nice things to or about the eventual loser. &#8220;You have a good point there.&#8221; &#8220;You were aggrieved.&#8221; Sometimes, they do it by saying something negative to the eventual winner, making the eventual loser feel better. It&#8217;s all about feelings, you see.<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, beware when the judge makes you think you&#8217;ve got a good case, or that the other side has a bad one. The reversal will come.<\/p>\n<p>So, in the Obamacare case before the Supreme Court, get your act more together and fight harder when the judge seems like he or she will find for you.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ever wonder what goes through the mind of a judge? Well, there are many things and many judges. Nonetheless, there are some common themes, as one who has done a fair amount of testifying and watching judges might tell you. &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/psychepolitics.com\/?p=417\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/psychepolitics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/417"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/psychepolitics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/psychepolitics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/psychepolitics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/psychepolitics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=417"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/psychepolitics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/417\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":419,"href":"https:\/\/psychepolitics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/417\/revisions\/419"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/psychepolitics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=417"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/psychepolitics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=417"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/psychepolitics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=417"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}